Skip to Navigation | Skip to Content

think4yourself

Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich went back and forth over Gingrich’s comment that the Palestinians are an “invented people.” Toward the end of the exchange, Romney attempted to use the issue to paint Gingrich as someone who, as president, would shoot from the hip and whose lack of discipline would cause problems for the U.S. abroad and hurt the nation’s foreign diplomacy.

“If I’m president of the United States, I will exercise sobriety, care, stability, and make sure that in a setting like this, anything I say that can affect a place with rockets going in, with people dying, I don’t do anything that will harm that process,” Romney said of Israel.

“And therefore before I made a statement of that nature, I’d get on the phone to my friend Bibi Netanyahu and say, ‘Would it help if I said this? What would you like me to do? Let’s work together because we’re partners. I’m not a bomb-thrower, rhetorically or literally,” Romney said.

Gingrich, who could be seen winking to someone in the audience as Romney talked, turned the contrast around and used it to his own advantage, and in the process effectively called Romney “timid.”

“I think sometimes that it’s helpful to have a president of the United States who has the courage to tell the truth,” Gingrich said, arguing that then-President Ronald Reagan went around his national security advisers to call the Soviet Union an “evil empire” and “overruled” the State Department to utter his famous “Tear down this wall” line.

“Reagan believed the power of truth, restated to the world, reframed the world,” Gingrich said. “I’m a Reaganite. I’m proud to be a Reaganite. I will tell the truth, even if it’s at the risk of causing some confusion, sometimes with the timid.”

Jon Ward

No names were mentioned when the candidates were asked whether voters should consider marital fidelity in making their choice for president. But it was no accident that Newt Gingrich looked a bit uncomfortable as each of his opponents took a turn at answering.

Rick Perry said he “made a vow to my wife and a vow to God” and that was “even stronger than a handshake in Texas.” When ABC’s George Stephanopolous asked if infidelity made a politician more likely to break faith with the voters, Perry responded, “If you will cheat on your wife, cheat on your spouse, why not cheat on your business partner?”

Rick Santorum said that marital infidelities are “not a disqualifier” but are “certainly a factor” and that in electing a leader, “trust is everything.”

Michele Bachmann, in a Newt-onian flourish, cited the Federalist Papers, saying that what is needed in a president is not wealth, education or position. “It is what is the measure of the man, or, in this case, woman. Will they keep their word? Will they be a man or woman of integrity? That’s what they cared about. … Who are you really? What’s your core?” she said.

Then it was Gingrich’s turn. “Well, first of all, it’s a real issue,” he conceded, noting that voters “have to have a feeling this is a person they can trust. … People have to render judgment.”

“I’ve said I made mistakes,” he added as the TV cameras showed his third wife, Callista. He then suggested that given that he is now a 68-year-old grandfather, it might be time to move on. “I’m delighted at the way people have been willing to look at who I am,” said Gingrich.

Andrea Stone

I don’t agree with the anti-capitalist message. But I do agree that this country is never again going to bail out corporations. I do agree that we have blown through trillions and trillions of dollars with nothing to show on the balance sheet but debt… and I do agree that we have banks that are too big to fail in this economy.”

Check out DC Decoder for more coverage!

Jon Huntsman, explaining where he does agree with the Occupy Wall Street movement. (via shortformblog)

(Source: shortformblog)

Oh thank you sweet baby jeebus…

kileyrae:

cognitivedissonance:

It’s over.

Summary:

  • Rick Perry had a meltdown. His train of thought derailed multiple times and he was slurring his words slightly.
  • Mitt Romney’s hair was jauntily tousled and he probably gets a boost from this.
  • Herman Cain proved he’s not a misogynist by referring to Rep. Nancy Pelosi as “Princess Nancy” and gave Jim Cramer a stroke by referencing 9-9-9 when Cramer said specifically not to at all.
  • Michele Bachmann insulted poor people by saying they could pay taxes by buying “two less Happy Meals.”
  • Ron Paul suggested students pay for college like they pay for cell phones and that getting rid of student loans will make the price go down. He alternated between Grandpa Simpson and soothsayer.
  • Rick Santorum was lost because he couldn’t talk about abortions and gay people killing America. 
  • Newt Gingrich got his ass handed to him by moderators for claiming “media is not reporting accurately how the economy works.” At a CNBC debate.
  • Jon Huntsman was the grown-up in the room, reminding everyone Americans watching this debate are hurting. They’re losing their jobs, their houses, and there’s no simple solution. He had ideas versus talking points. So he’s going to sink further than 1% in the polls.

#Obama2012

DC Decoder: What Decoder learned at the Tea Party Debate tonight

shortformblog:

dcdecoder:

  • Mitt Romney shouldn’t try to pretend he plays poker
  • Michele Bachmann thinks fixing the economy would be a snap
  • Ron Paul hates strongly dislikes Rick Perry
  • Tea Partiers hate Ben Bernanke, and so does Rick Perry
  • Rick Perry hates little girls; all other candidates love little girls,…

We’d like to add “Some people really love the idea of poor sick people dying” to this list.

(Source: dcdecoder, via kileyrae)

inothernews:

“How can you deny the science of evolution?  With my ‘science’ answer, you just saw me evolve into someone with no chance of winning the Republican nomination.”

— JON STEWART, on GOP presidential candidate Jon Huntsman’s “We can’t run from science” declaration, on The Daily Show

inothernews:

“How can you deny the science of evolution?  With my ‘science’ answer, you just saw me evolve into someone with no chance of winning the Republican nomination.”

— JON STEWART, on GOP presidential candidate Jon Huntsman’s “We can’t run from science” declaration, on The Daily Show

I think there’s a serious problem. The minute that the Republican Party becomes the party – the anti-science party, we have a huge problem. We lose a whole lot of people who would otherwise allow us to win the election in 2012. When we take a position that isn’t willing to embrace evolution, when we take a position that basically runs counter to what 98 of 100 climate scientists have said, what the National Academy of Science – Sciences has said about what is causing climate change and man’s contribution to it, I think we find ourselves on the wrong side of science, and, therefore, in a losing position.


The Republican Party has to remember that we’re drawing from traditions that go back as far as Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, President Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan and Bush. And we’ve got a lot of traditions to draw upon. But I can’t remember a time in our history where we actually were willing to shun science and become a – a party that – that was antithetical to science. I’m not sure that’s good for our future and it’s not a winning formula.

GOP presidential hopeful Jon “call me crazy” Huntsman, on ABC News’ This Week, when asked about Rick Perry’s stance on evolution and climate change.

Distinguishing yourself from the pack: you’re doing it right.

(via pantslessprogressive)

(via pantslessprogressive)