In response to my post about the Confederate States of America going for Romney, some Romney/Ryan Tumblr bloggers rushed in to point out how offended they are and how there’s no such thing as racism anymore.
First there was this one, short and to-the-point:
Nothing but a race baiter…
Then this one:
wow, this person does realize that the confederate states existed a long time ago right? they’re long gone. stupid liberals and their race-baiting, i can’t stand it.
Then this one:
Maybe because the CSA actually had to do with traditionalism, a booming economy, citizen’s rights, and state’s rights?
And then this one:
Anybody want to mention the fact that the Confederacy was made up of Democrats. History people, learn it.
And then almost certainly the best possible one:
I support the CSA (I don’t think the main issue was slavery btw) I feel like it was a good thing that our founding fathers would have supported. I think democrats have changed a lot, they were decent for a long time then something happened and they all became a bunch of commies
Until I saw this one:
Don’t forget the KKK was started by the Democrats. They went after black and white Republicans to start.
So thank you, my GOP friends; you’ve made my point so much more eloquently than I ever could have done.
In principle, I don’t have any problem at all with people who write anonymously or pseudonymously. But in practice I find it incredibly troubling.
It’s clear that, for some, this is really the only way to express oneself or to publish critical points of view. There are bloggers who have a credible fear of persecution based on identity, religious belief, or political opinion. For them, the ability to publish anonymously is incredibly important. And it’s important for us too, as we wouldn’t be able to hear their voices otherwise. That’s why I allow anonymous comments and questions on my blog.
But when people write anonymously or pseudonymously online, they must recognize that they face a real challenge.
In our daily lives, we filter the things we say for all sorts of reasons: We don’t want to hurt someone else’s feelings; we don’t want people to think badly of us; we feel, deep down, that some words are out of bounds. But online, we seem to feel sometimes like we don’t need to do that filtering … especially if no one knows who we are.
There’s something freeing, to be sure, about being able to say anything you want. You can engage in unfounded name-calling, or intentionally hurt someone’s feelings, or just generally behave like a twelve year old. And no one will know it’s you.
And that’s why I don’t read many blogs that are written by people who prefer to remain anonymous or who write under pseudonyms when there isn’t really any reason for them to do so. In fact, I don’t think there are any blogs I read on a daily basis whose authors are anonymous. The anonymous or pseudonymous blogs are often just filled with cruelty, name-calling, and bad arguments. Indeed, there are a great many people who choose to write under an assumed name because they want to harass or offend others. These people would never say these things to someone else’s face because they know and fear the consequences; instead, they hide behind their anonymity to do it (hoping, I guess, that their IP address is somehow being hidden, though it generally is not). This is cowardice, plain and simple.
It’s also why I write under my own name. First of all, it’s a privilege to be free to publish my opinions and arguments with my name on them. But also, it’s helpful to me to keep in mind that my name is going to be attached to the things that I put online for others to read. This often leads me to spend more time on my posts or comments rather than simply dashing them off and moving on to the next thing. It’s why I try to write out arguments rather than simply quoting someone and writing “LOL” or “This is stupid.” And, finally, it’s why I try to get to know the people who repeatedly take the time to comment on my blog in thoughtful ways, even if they do so anonymously. Occasionally, these people choose to remain anonymous, but most of the time we continue our conversations on Facebook, Twitter, or Google+ (where they write under their own names).
There’s certainly something important about the option of anonymity so you’ll never read an argument entirely against it from me. But it can also be a weapon and the people who use it to bully others are threatening to silence those who require anonymity in order to speak at all by encouraging the rest of us to generally ignore anonymous or pseudonymous authors.
Really? ‘Nerds’? You know, actually, I think the word you’re looking for is ‘experts,’ to enlighten you so your laws won’t backfire and break the Internet.
JON STEWART, on members of Congress considering the SOPA and PIPA bills exasperatedly calling for “nerds” to help them understand SOPA and PIPA, on The Daily Show.
Why does Congress bother convening at all?
According to lawyers… (SOPA) doesn’t shut down your website and remove it from the Internet. It just makes it so that people cannot, in any way, access the website. So it’s sort of like coming up with a plan to prevent teen pregnancy that includes filling penises with cement.
After Wikipedia blackrout, somewhere, a student today is doing original research and getting his/her facts straight. Perish the thought.