After he made the point that the economy sucks so bad that border-crossings are at a 40 year low.
Hahahahahaha.
By this logic…Perry could achieve this promise through his economic policies
Texas College Democrats is now only 200 likes away from Rick Perry’s turnout in New Hampshire! Help us close that gap by South Carolina.
Do it now. They’re awesome.
(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)
It would be glorious.
Amy did an AWESOME job with these.
In real life, it’s probably not a good idea to eat rainbow-colored ham.
(via diegueno)
Easy-going late-night star Jay Leno showed a rare flash of anger Friday night on “The Tonight Show” when he blasted Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry for a recent campaign commercial.
The now-infamous TV spot — aimed chiefly at so-called “evangelical” voters in Iowa, site of the first primary of 2012 on Jan. 3 — has Perry wearing a rugged light-brown jacket and complaining vaguely about President Obama’s “war on religion.” In making his point, he also seems to denigrate homosexuals who serve their country in the military.
This is what ticked off Leno, who made his opinion known in a segment with guest Bill O’Reilly of Fox News Channel. The two discussed the spot after Leno showed it on the air.
“What ‘war on religion’?” Leno asked after the spot was played. “Hello? Did we kill Santa Claus now? What happened?”
“You gotta admit the jacket is good, though – love the jacket!” O’Reilly exclaimed.
To which Leno responded: “It’s the same jacket Heath Ledger wore in ‘Brokeback Mountain’ but we won’t go there!”
After the laughter subsided after that one, Leno turned serious. “That ad really pissed me off,” he said.
“But do you know why he put out that ad?” asked O’Reilly before launching into an explanation of Perry’s campaign strategy.
“I don’t care!” said Leno. “It means he’ll say anything to get a vote!” […]
(Please note that this slanted/poorly written article comes from Adam Buckman
of Xfinity TV - Comcast. Mr. Buckman doesn’t appear to know what the word “vaguely” means. He also has trouble with the definition of the phrase “seems to”.)
Rick Perry, doing that thing he does. Hey, Rick, can you point out “Solynda” on a map? EDIT: Uncorrected the spelling. (via shortformblog)
Wow.
(via kileyrae)
(via kileyrae)
Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich went back and forth over Gingrich’s comment that the Palestinians are an “invented people.” Toward the end of the exchange, Romney attempted to use the issue to paint Gingrich as someone who, as president, would shoot from the hip and whose lack of discipline would cause problems for the U.S. abroad and hurt the nation’s foreign diplomacy.
“If I’m president of the United States, I will exercise sobriety, care, stability, and make sure that in a setting like this, anything I say that can affect a place with rockets going in, with people dying, I don’t do anything that will harm that process,” Romney said of Israel.
“And therefore before I made a statement of that nature, I’d get on the phone to my friend Bibi Netanyahu and say, ‘Would it help if I said this? What would you like me to do? Let’s work together because we’re partners. I’m not a bomb-thrower, rhetorically or literally,” Romney said.
Gingrich, who could be seen winking to someone in the audience as Romney talked, turned the contrast around and used it to his own advantage, and in the process effectively called Romney “timid.”
“I think sometimes that it’s helpful to have a president of the United States who has the courage to tell the truth,” Gingrich said, arguing that then-President Ronald Reagan went around his national security advisers to call the Soviet Union an “evil empire” and “overruled” the State Department to utter his famous “Tear down this wall” line.
“Reagan believed the power of truth, restated to the world, reframed the world,” Gingrich said. “I’m a Reaganite. I’m proud to be a Reaganite. I will tell the truth, even if it’s at the risk of causing some confusion, sometimes with the timid.”
— Jon Ward
No names were mentioned when the candidates were asked whether voters should consider marital fidelity in making their choice for president. But it was no accident that Newt Gingrich looked a bit uncomfortable as each of his opponents took a turn at answering.
Rick Perry said he “made a vow to my wife and a vow to God” and that was “even stronger than a handshake in Texas.” When ABC’s George Stephanopolous asked if infidelity made a politician more likely to break faith with the voters, Perry responded, “If you will cheat on your wife, cheat on your spouse, why not cheat on your business partner?”
Rick Santorum said that marital infidelities are “not a disqualifier” but are “certainly a factor” and that in electing a leader, “trust is everything.”
Michele Bachmann, in a Newt-onian flourish, cited the Federalist Papers, saying that what is needed in a president is not wealth, education or position. “It is what is the measure of the man, or, in this case, woman. Will they keep their word? Will they be a man or woman of integrity? That’s what they cared about. … Who are you really? What’s your core?” she said.
Then it was Gingrich’s turn. “Well, first of all, it’s a real issue,” he conceded, noting that voters “have to have a feeling this is a person they can trust. … People have to render judgment.”
“I’ve said I made mistakes,” he added as the TV cameras showed his third wife, Callista. He then suggested that given that he is now a 68-year-old grandfather, it might be time to move on. “I’m delighted at the way people have been willing to look at who I am,” said Gingrich.
— Andrea Stone
Rick Perry talking tough about immigration tonight, working very hard to emphasize that he’s not week on this issue.
He just went there. (via kileyrae)
Not defending Newt here, but what the hell does this really have to do with being President